Bowers v. Cartledge
| James Bowers |
| Leroy Cartledge |
| 0:2014cv00358 |
| February 11, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Rock Hill Office |
| McCormick |
| Richard M Gergel |
| Paige J Gossett |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
79
ORDER granting 1 Petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus and 48 Petitioner's Motion for Summary Judgment; and denying 47 Respondent's Motion for Summary Judgment. Respondent is directed to appoint Petitioner new state criminal trial counsel for resentencing within 10 days of this order and to resentence Petitioner within 120 days of this order. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 12/21/2015. (gmil)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER re 33 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by James Bowers. It is ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall strike petitioner's pro se amended petition from the docket. The Clerk of Court is also directed to mail the petitioner the court's September 23, 2014, Order appointing him counsel in this matter. It is further ORDERED that counsel for the petitioner shall file the proposed pleading as granted by the court's October 27, 2014, Order as an Amended Petition on or before November 10, 2014. Modified to edit docket text on 11/4/2014 (gmil).
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER, The Respondent shall, on or before December 1, 2014, supplement his Return and Memorandum of Law to address the grounds raised in Bowers' Petition. In connection with his Return, the Respondent may also file another motion for summary judgment directed at the grounds of the Petition if he so desires. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 9/24/2014. (gmil)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER - The Court finds that appointment of counsel is proper in these circumstances and hereby appoints Matthew Nickles of the Charleston County Bar as counsel for Plaintiff. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 9/23/2014. (gmil)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER RULING ON 22 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Respondent's Motion for Summary Judgment 14 is hereby DENIED and the matter is recommitted to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Richard M. Gergel on 9/22/2014. (gmil)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER re 14 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Leroy Cartledge. The petitioner shall advise the court as to whether he wishes to continue with this case and to file a response to the respondent's motion f or summary judgment within fourteen (14) days from the date of this order. The petitioner is further advised that if he fails to respond, this action will be recommended for dismissal with prejudice for failure to prosecute. (Response to Motion due by 7/15/2014.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J Gossett on 7/1/2014. (abuc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bowers v. Cartledge | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: James Bowers | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Leroy Cartledge | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
