Moragne v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
| Landis Allen Moragne |
| South Carolina Department of Corrections, Cecilia Reynolds, Warden Sharp, Warden Nolan, John One Doe, John Two Doe, Not None Deasi, Lt Odom and William Byrnes, Jr |
| 1:2015cv01010 |
| March 2, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Aiken Office |
| Lee |
| Timothy M Cain |
| Shiva V Hodges |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
54
JUDGMENT dismissing case for lack of prosecution. (mwal)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER adopting 31 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's 18 Motion to Amend his complaint is denied to the extent that he seeks to add SCDC Director Bryan P. Stirling as a Defendant. Signed by Honorable Timothy M Cain on 9/21/2015. (mwal)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER granting Plaintiff's 18 MOTION to Amend as to Deasi, Gram, and Sligh. To the extent that counsel for Defendants may be willing to accept service of the summons and complaint on behalf of Deasi, Gram, and Sligh, counsel is directed to so advise by filing a notice on the docket by September 10, 2015. James Sligh and NN Gram added. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V Hodges on 8/28/2015. (mwal)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER adopting 13 Report and Recommendation. Therefore, SCDC, Director William Byrnes, and Lt. Odom aredismissed without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. Signed by Honorable Timothy M Cain on 6/11/2015. (mwal)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
