Lovingood et al v. MI Windows and Doors, Inc.

Plaintiff: Gail E. Loder and James R. Lovingood
Defendant: MI Windows and Doors Inc
Case Number: 2:2013cv00049
Filed: January 3, 2013
Court: South Carolina District Court
Office: Charleston Office
County: XUS, Outside State
Presiding Judge: David C Norton
Nature of Suit: Tort Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lovingood et al v. MI Windows and Doors, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gail E. Loder
Represented By: Andrew Joseph Coomes
Represented By: Jordan Lucas Chaikin
Represented By: Daniel K Bryson
Represented By: Justin O'Toole Lucey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James R. Lovingood
Represented By: Justin O'Toole Lucey
Represented By: Andrew Joseph Coomes
Represented By: Jordan Lucas Chaikin
Represented By: Daniel K Bryson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MI Windows and Doors Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.