Acevedo v. Thomas
Petitioner: David A Acevedo
Respondent: Linda Thomas
Case Number: 4:2014cv03985
Filed: October 15, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Florence Office
County: Edgefield
Presiding Judge: David C Norton
Presiding Judge: Thomas E Rogers
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 12, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER granting 16 Motion for Reconsideration. Petitioner shall have until March 6, 2015 to bring this case into proper form. The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of the Proper Form Order to the petitioner along with this order. Signed by Honorable David C Norton on 2/12/2015.(eric, )
January 23, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 12 JUDGMENT, by the Clerk. This case is dismissed without prejudice. (dsto, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Acevedo v. Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: David A Acevedo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Linda Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?