Lee v. Cartledge
Petitioner: Billy Nathan Lee
Respondent: Leroy Cartledge
Case Number: 6:2015cv01603
Filed: April 17, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Greenville Office
County: Horry
Presiding Judge: Bruce Howe Hendricks
Presiding Judge: Kevin McDonald
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 25, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 29 . It is therefore ORDERED that Respondents motion for summary judgment is GRANTED and Petitioners § 2254 petition is DISMISSED with prejudice. A Certificate of Appealability is denied. Signed by Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks on 1/25/2016. (kric, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lee v. Cartledge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Billy Nathan Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Leroy Cartledge
Represented By: Donald John Zelenka
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?