Smith v. Atkinson

Petitioner: Ralph Edward Smith
Respondent: Kenny Atkinson
Case Number: 8:2013cv00919
Filed: April 10, 2013
Court: South Carolina District Court
Office: Anderson/Greenwood Office
County: Edgefield
Presiding Judge: Timothy M Cain
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 11, 2013 23 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER RULING ON 10 Report and Recommendation; declining to adopt the report. Instead, the court hereby notifies Petitioner of its intent to recharacterize the petition as a § 2255 motion. Petitioner is directed to file a response to this Order by June 26, 2013, indicating whether he consents to having this § 2241 petition converted to a § 2255 motion and transferred to the sentencing court. Signed by Honorable Timothy M Cain on 6/11/13. (kmca)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Atkinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ralph Edward Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Kenny Atkinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.