United States of America v. Kuyper et al
United States of America |
Kuyper Family Living Trust, Vision Unlimited, Curtis Cavett, Duane L. Kuyper and Mary L. Kuyper |
Raymond Ehrman, Mary L. Kuyper and Duane L. Kuyper |
Internal Revenue Service, Office of Inspector General, Congress of the United States of America, James M. Daugherty, Brendan V. Johnson, Daniel A. Applegate, United States District Court and Department of the Treasury- Internal Revenue Service |
4:2011cv04170 |
December 1, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of South Dakota |
Southern Division Office |
Aurora |
Karen E. Schreier |
Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant) |
26 U.S.C. ยง 7403 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 88 JUDGMENT in favor of United States of America against Duane L. Kuyper individually and as Trustee of Kuyper Family Living Trust, Mary Kuyper, individually and as trustee of Kuyper Family Living Trust, Kuyper Family Living Trust, Vision Unlimited, and Raymond Ehrman, as Trustee of Vision Unlimited, as specifically set forth in the Judgment. Signed by Hon. Richard G. Kopf on 11/4/13. (DJP) |
Filing 85 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 83 Motion for Sanctions. Signed by Hon. Richard G. Kopf on 10/23/13. (SLW) |
Filing 47 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER striking sua sponte from the court file 35 Motion to Dismiss; striking sua sponte from the court file, with execption 41 Answer and Counterclaim (Paragraphs 1-72 and 88-94 are stricken insofar as they are alleged on behalf of Vision Unlimited or Kuyper Family Living Trust, paragraphs 73-87 are stricken in their entirety, and paragraphs 95-106 are not stricken); striking sua sponte from the court file, with exception 43 Amended Answer and Counterclaim (Paragraphs 1-72, 88-94, 107-115, and 119-123 are sticken insofar as they are alleged on behalf of Vision Unlimited or Kuyper Family Living Trust, paragraphs 73-87 and 116-118 are stricken in their entirety, paragraphs 95-106 are not stricken); granting in part and de nying in part 42 Motion to Dismiss, Motion to Strike; granting in part and denying in part 44 Motion to Dismiss, Motion to Strike; and denying 45 Motion to Require Reply to Counterclaim. The plaintiff may file a reply to the answer of Duane Kuy per and Mary Kuyper (Docket nos. 41 and 43 , paragraphs 1-64) within 21 days. Vision Unlimited or its trusteee shall be allowed 30 days in which to obtain counsel to file an answer to the Amended Complaint. Signed by Hon. Richard G. Kopf on 10/3/2012. (SST) |
Filing 40 ORDER denying 35 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Hon. Richard G. Kopf on 05/29/2012. (MWT) |
Filing 24 ORDER denying [] Motion to Change Venue; granting in part and denying in part 20 Motion to Strike re 9 Answer to Complaint and Third Party Complaint; denying 22 Objection. The Third Party Complaint is stricken and no person or entity named as a third-party defendant shall be considered a party to this action, including Raymond Ehrman. The Answer to Complaint is stricken except insofar as it denies all allegations made by the United States in it's Complaint. Signed by Hon. Richard G. Kopf on 2/29/12. (SST) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.