General Motors LLC v. Rapp Chevrolet, Inc.

Plaintiff: General Motors LLC
Defendant: Rapp Chevrolet, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2012cv04209
Filed: December 12, 2012
Court: South Dakota District Court
Office: Southern Division Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Roberto A. Lange
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1121 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 21, 2013 22 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION AND ORDER granting 12 Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by U.S. District Judge Roberto A. Lange on 05/21/2013. (LH)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: General Motors LLC v. Rapp Chevrolet, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: General Motors LLC
Represented By: James Stuart Simko
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rapp Chevrolet, Inc.
Represented By: Jeffrey Alan Cole
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.