LeBeau v. Progressive Northern Insurance Company

Defendant: Progressive Northern Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Brooke LeBeau
Case Number: 5:2012cv05044
Filed: July 9, 2012
Court: South Dakota District Court
Office: Western Division Office
County: Dewey
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey L. Viken
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 21, 2013 20 Opinion or Order of the Court AMENDED ORDER granting plaintiff's 14 motion to extend deadlines. Discovery deadline May 1, 2014; Motions deadline June 30, 2014. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Veronica L. Duffy on 10/21/2013. (Duffy, Veronica)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LeBeau v. Progressive Northern Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Progressive Northern Insurance Company
Represented By: Mark J. Arndt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brooke LeBeau
Represented By: Robin L. Zephier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.