Meidinger v. City of Rapid City et al
| Randall J. Meidinger |
| City of Rapid City, Peter Ragnone, Steve Allender, Jerry Wright, John Leahy and Sam Kooiker |
| 5:2012cv05064 |
| September 7, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of South Dakota |
| Western Division Office |
| Pennington |
| Jeffrey L. Viken |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
155
ORDER denying 104 Motion for Attorney Fees; denying as moot 124 Motion to Strike; denying as moot 129 Motion in Limine; granting 130 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying as moot 145 Motion to Strike. Signed by Chief Judge Jeffrey L. Viken on 9/26/15. (SB)
|
|
Filing
102
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 38 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying as moot 44 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; adopting 90 Report and Recommendation; overruling 93 Objection to Report and Recommendation; overruling in part and moot in part 94 Objection to Report and Recommendation. Signed by Chief Judge Jeffrey L. Viken on 9/23/14. (SB)
|
|
Filing
91
ORDER denying 84 Motion to Disqualify Counsel. Signed by US Magistrate Judge John E. Simko on 4/24/14. (JLS)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER denying 6 Motion for More Definite Statement; denying 6 Motion to Strike. Signed by US Magistrate Judge John E. Simko on 10/31/12. (SLW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
