MAKS, Inc et al v. EODT General Security Company et al
Plaintiff: MAKS, Inc, General Trading & Contracting Co., Gopalakrishna Pillai Ajeesh Kumar Kammarayil, Mohammed Azad Shabbir, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and John Doe 3
Defendant: EODT General Security Company, EOD Technology, Inc, Matt Kaye, Mark Anderson, Jack Doe 1, Jack Doe 2 and Jack Doe 3
Case Number: 3:2010cv00443
Filed: October 21, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Office: Knoxville Office
County: Loudon
Presiding Judge: H Bruce Guyton
Presiding Judge: Thomas A Varlan
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Property Damage
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 487 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 475 Motion to Increase Supersedeas Bond or, in the Alternative, to Lift Stay on Post Judgment Discovery and Compel Discovery by MAKS Inc General Trading and Contracting Co.. Signed by Magistrate Judge H Bruce Guyton on 5/23/14. (JBR)
April 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 474 ORDER that the Court OVERRULES Sterlings objections 460 and ACCEPTS IN WHOLE the R&R 458 . Therefore, MAKS Inc. General Trading and Contracting Co.s Petition for the Award of Contractual Attorneys Fees and Costs 369 is hereby GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. MAKS is AWARDED $283,408.00 in attorneys fees and $44,108.91 in costs, for a total of $327,516.91. Signed by Chief District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 4/30/14. (ABF)
February 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 459 ORDER accepting in whole 457 Magistrate Judge Guyton's Report and Recommendation and ORDERS that MAKS be AWARDED prejudgment interest at a rate of 5.00% per annum, which amounts to $169,927.40 in interest accruing f rom September 9, 2009, to the date of judgment on Work Authorization 01 and $161,476.03 in interest accruing from October 23, 2009, to the date of judgment on Work Authorization 02, as well as post-judgment interest at a rate of 0.15% per annum from the date of the entry of judgment to the date of the decision on the R&R. Signed by Chief District Judge Thomas A Varlan on February 20, 2014. (AYB)
January 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 457 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending that 1) MAKS's request for assessment of prejudgment interest and post-judgment interest at a rate of 10% per annum be DENIED. 2) MAKS be awarded post-judgment interest at a rate of 0 .15% from February 14, 2013 to the date of decision on this Report and Recommendation. MAKS be awarded prejudgment interest at a rate of 5%: from September 9, 2009, to entry of Judgment on Work Authorization 01 ($990,000.00), for a tot al of $169,927.40 in prejudgment interest on Work Authorization 01; and from October 23, 2009, to entry of Judgment on Work Authorization 02 ($975,000.00), for a total of $161,476.03 in prejudgment interest on Work Authorization 02. and 3) MAKS be awarded post-judgment interest at a rate of 0.15% from entry of the Judgment to the date of decision on this Report and Recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge H Bruce Guyton on January 27, 2014. (AYB)
December 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 444 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 429 Motion for a Stay of Execution Pending Appeal and granting 429 Motion to Approve Bond. The Plaintiffs SHALL HAVE LEAVE to move for an increase in the amount of the supersedeas bond after the und ersigned issues a Report and Recommendation on the amount of the attorneys fees, costs, and pre- and post-judgment interest and the District Judge issues a Memorandum and Order ruling upon the Report and Recommendation.Signed by Magistrate Judge H Bruce Guyton on 12/30/2013. (KAW)
September 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 423 ORDER denying without prejudice 388 Motion for Sanctions; granting 406 Motion to Stay Execution and Other Proceedings; and denying as moot 417 Motion to Set Aside and 410 Claim of Exemptions. All pending and future execution s, all pending and future garnishments, all pending and future discovery, and motions relating to the Judgment entered February 14, 2013, are STAYED pending decision on the Motion for New Trial [Doc. 356].Signed by Magistrate Judge H Bruce Guyton on 09/20/2013. (KAW)
August 12, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 381 ORDER in which Sterling Operations' Motion to Alter, Amend, and/or Correct the Judgment 338 , MAKS Inc. General Trading and Contracting Co.'s Motion to Alter and/or Amend the Judgment of February 14, 2013 347 , Sterling Operations' Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law as to Counts IV and V of the Amended Complaint 341 , and MAKS Inc. General Trading and Contracting Co.'s Renewed Motion to Amend Complaint to Include Sterling Global Operations, In c. as Defendant 355 are DENIED. The Court DIRECTS plaintiffs to file a response to Sterling Operations' Motion for New Trial and/or Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law as to Counts I and II of the Amended Complaint and the Counterclaim or Remittitur in the Alternative 356 within fourteen (14) days of the entry of this order. Signed by Chief District Judge Thomas A Varlan on August 12, 2013. (AYB)
July 24, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 380 ORDER The Court finds that Sterling Operations SHALL produce the documents listed in Request No. 8. In addition, the Court GRANTS MAKSs request to depose Matt Kaye, Lisa Jacobson, and Erick Quist. Finally, if MAKS wants any additional discovery, it shall seek leave of the Court.Signed by Magistrate Judge H Bruce Guyton on 07/24/2013. (KAW)
November 9, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 296 ORDER addressing numerous evidentiary objections of the parties' as set forth more fully herein. Objections not addressed in this Memorandum and Order will be addressed by the District Judge at the trial of this matter. Signed by Magistrate Judge H Bruce Guyton on November 9, 2012. (AYB)
August 23, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 230 ORDER that the Court ACCEPTS IN WHOLE the Report and Recommendation 220 and GRANTS in part and DENIES in part the Motion for Partial Dismissal 116 .. Signed by District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 8/23/12. (ABF)
August 15, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 225 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 188 MAKS's Motion to Compel Production of Documents Listed in EODT's Privilege Log; denying 191 EODT's First Motion for Sanctions, but Plaintiff Azad is ORDERED to sit fo r a deposition in this matter, on an agreed-upon date and time, no later than August 27, 2012; denying as moot 193 MAKS's Motion for Sanctions Against Defendant EOD Technology Inc. for Violation of the Court's Order of May 27, 2011; denyi ng 200 EODT's Second Motion for Protective Order; granting 212 MAKS's Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery Following the Court Lifting the Stay on Discovery Entered on July 19, 2012, in that the stay of discovery in this matter will be LIFTED; and the parties shall have up to and including September 14, 2012, to complete the taking of discovery in this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge H Bruce Guyton on August 15, 2012. (AYB)
July 12, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 190 ORDER finding that the Motion for Entry of a Protective Order 88 is now moot, and it is DENIED AS MOOT. The hearing in this case set to take place July 16, 2012, at 1:30 p.m. is CANCELLED. Signed by Magistrate Judge H Bruce Guyton on July 12, 2012. (AYB)
July 6, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 187 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding discovery disputes - Signed by Magistrate Judge H Bruce Guyton on 7/06/2012. (KMK)
March 12, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 111 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 103 Motion for Reconsideration of Plaintiffs' Motion to Add Thomas Dwyer, Loren Hughes, Susan Davis, Les Lunceford, Floyd Weed, Matt Knetche, and James Pearson as Defendants. Signed by District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 3/12/12. (ADA)
December 12, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 102 ORDER that the Court DENIES Plaintiffs' motion to strike 98 . The Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part plaintiffs' motion to amend 92 . The Motion is denied to the extent plaintiffs seek to add new defendants in place of the "Jack Doe" defendants, but granted in all other respects. Plaintiff shall file the proposed amended complaint, without the allegations pertaining to the seven newly-named defendants and without any material changes to the substance that was proposed to the Court, within 21 days of the entry of this order. The Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims 53 , Motion to Dismiss Claims of Plaintiffs John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and John Doe #3 77 , Motion for Summary Judgment 79 and Emergency Motion for the Court to Stay Briefing and Consideration of Matt Kaye's Motion for Summary Judgment 94 are DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 12/12/11. (ABF)
August 1, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 63 ORDER denying Plaintiff's 11 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings with Respect to Liability on Counts I, III, IV, and VI of the Complaint. Signed by District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 8/1/11. (ABF)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MAKS, Inc et al v. EODT General Security Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MAKS, Inc
Represented By: Douglas R Pierce
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: General Trading & Contracting Co.
Represented By: Douglas R Pierce
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gopalakrishna Pillai Ajeesh Kumar Kammarayil
Represented By: Douglas R Pierce
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mohammed Azad Shabbir
Represented By: Douglas R Pierce
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Doe 1
Represented By: Douglas R Pierce
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Doe 2
Represented By: Douglas R Pierce
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Doe 3
Represented By: Douglas R Pierce
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: EODT General Security Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: EOD Technology, Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Matt Kaye
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jack Doe 1
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jack Doe 2
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jack Doe 3
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?