Lukas v. McPeak et al (TV1)
| Patrick P. Lukas |
| Miller Energy Resources, Inc., Jonathan S. Gross, Herman Gettelfinger, David Hall, Charles M. Stivers, Merrill A. McPeak, Scott M. Boruff, Deloy Miller, David Voyticky and Don A. Turkleson |
| 3:2011cv00422 |
| August 31, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Knoxville Office |
| Knox |
| C Clifford Shirley |
| Thomas A Varlan |
| Stockholders Suits |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
ORDER denying 20 Plaintiff Jacquelyn Flynn's Motion to Consolidate Related Actions and for the Appointment of Lead and Liaison Counsel; granting 19 Plaintiff Patrick Lukas's Motion for Consolidation and Appointment of Lead Counsel and Liaison Counsel and in Opposition to Plaintiff Jaquelyn Flynn's Motion for Consolidation and Appointment of Lead Counsel; Case Nos. 3:11-CV-412 and 3:11-CV-422 are CONSOLIDATED, and Patrick P. Lukas v. Merrill A. McPeak, et al., No. 3:11-CV-422 will serve as the CONSOLIDATED LEAD CASE; the parties SHALL FILE any further documents and/or pleadings for both cases in the lead case only; Patrick P. Lukas is APPOINTED lead plaintiff; Levi & Korinsky is APPOINTED lead counsel; and Holified & Associates is APPOINTED liaison counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge C Clifford Shirley on June 26, 2012. (AYB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
