Ilar et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al (TV2)
| James Ilar and Kristi Ilar |
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., U.S. Bank, N.A., Mortgage Lenders Network USA, Inc, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc and Does 1-10 |
| 3:2012cv00304 |
| June 25, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Knoxville Office |
| Anderson |
| C Clifford Shirley |
| Thomas A Varlan |
| Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
74
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Defendants' 27 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, and plaintiffs' claims against defendants are DISMISSED. In light of the court's ruling on defendants' summary judgment motion, def endants' 66 motion for involuntary dismissal is DENIED AS MOOT. Defendants' 56 motion in limine, as well as the 61 motion to strike, are DENIED AS MOOT. U.S. Bank's claims for possession of the subject property, damages for un lawful detainer, interest, attorney's fees, and costs, remain for trial which is scheduled for January 20, 2015. Signed by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on 12/4/14. Associated Cases: 3:12-cv-00304-PLR-CCS, 3:12-cv-00424-PLR-CCS (c/m) (JBR) Modified text on 12/4/2014 (JBR).
|
|
Filing
72
ORDER granting Motion to Withdraw as Attorney filed by Attorney John Frank Higgins. Mr. Higgins shall turn over his file to the Plaintiffs, and after doing so and complying with the Courts instructions below, both Mr. Higgins a nd Mr. Street are RELIEVED of their duties as counsel in this matter. As of the entry of this Memorandum and Order, Plaintiffs James Ilar and Kristi Ilar are DEEMED to be proceeding pro se, unless and until they obtain a new attorney, and they ar e hereby ADMONISHED that they must stay up to date on the status of this case and comply with the deadlines set by the Court or deadlines agreed to by counsel on their behalf. Further, the Plaintiffs, like any other party, will be expected to comp ly with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Local Rules, and the Court's Orders. The Clerk of Court SHALL MAIL a copy of this Memorandum and Order to the Plaintiffs, and Mr. Higgins is ORDERED to mail copies of all documents filed in this case through CM/ECF since July 24, 2014, to the Plaintiffs at no cost to the Plaintiffs. Signed by Magistrate Judge C Clifford Shirley, Jr on August 12, 2014. Associated Cases: 3:12-cv-00304-PLR-CCS, 3:12-cv-00424-PLR-CCS Order mailed to Plaintiffs. (RLK)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER granting (30) Motion to Quash (Notice of Deposition for a deposition on March 20, 2014 is QUASHED); denying without prejudice (32) Motion for Extension of Time to File; granting (26) Motion for Reconsideration in case 3:12-cv- 00304-PLR-CCS; denying (17) Motion to Amend Complaint; granting (21) Motion to Quash (Notice of Deposition for a deposition on March 20, 2014 is QUASHED); denying without prejudice (23) Motion for Extension of Time to File in case 3:12-cv-00424-PLR-CCS. Signed by Magistrate Judge C Clifford Shirley, Jr on 03/18/2014. Associated Cases: 3:12-cv-00304-PLR-CCS, 3:12-cv-00424-PLR-CCS (KAW)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER denying 22 Motion to Amend Complaint in case 3:12-cv-00304-TAV-CCS; denying 13 Motion to Amend Complaint in case 3:12-cv-00424-TAV-CCS. Signed by Magistrate Judge C Clifford Shirley, Jr on 02/28/2014. Associated Cases: 3:12-cv-00304-TAV-CCS, 3:12-cv-00424-TAV-CCS (c/m to J. Skipper Ray)(KAW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
