Galloway Construction, LLC v. Utilipath, LLC et al
| Galloway Construction, LLC and United States of America |
| Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Utilipath, LLC |
| Utilipath, LLC |
| Galloway Construction, LLC |
| 3:2013cv00161 |
| March 21, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Knoxville Office |
| Morgan |
| Karen K Caldwell |
| C Clifford Shirley |
| Miller Act |
| 40 U.S.C. ยง 3131 Miller Act |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 26 Motion for Reconsideration. Utilipath's 19 Motion to Vacate is Denied. This matter is remanded to the arbitration panel for clarification regarding the timing of the retainage payments and the arbitration panel's reasoning for rejecting Utilipath's counterclaims. Signed by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on 10/21/14. (JBR) (c/m) Modified text on 10/21/2014 (JBR).
|
|
Filing
25
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The plaintiff's motion and amended motion for judgment based on the arbitration award, [R. 13 & 17], are DENIED; the defendants' motion to vacate the arbitration award, [R. 19], is GRANTED. Th e Court finds the defendants' motion to stay the confirmation proceeding, [R. 16], is moot. The arbitration award is vacated and the parties are ORDERED to once again submit their dispute to binding arbitration pursuant to their arbitration agreement. Signed by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on 8/13/14. (JBR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
