Pendergrass v. Schofield et al
| Jeremy Pendergrass |
| Derrick Schofield, David Sexton and Amanda Hunter |
| 3:2015cv00129 |
| March 26, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Knoxville Office |
| Morgan |
| H Bruce Guyton |
| Thomas A Varlan |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
MEMORANDUM OPINION, a deficiency order was entered in this pro se prisoner's civil rights case, filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 6 . Plaintiff has not responded to this order or otherwise communicated with the Court. Accordin gly, the Court presumes that plaintiff is not a pauper and hereby ASSESSES him the full filing fee. The custodian of plaintiff's inmate trust account at Morgan County Correctional Complex is directed to submit to the Clerk as set forth. Judgmem t to follow. Signed by Chief District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 6/26/15. (cc Morgan County Correctional Complex, theCommissioner of the Tennessee Department of Correction, the Attorney General forthe State of Tennessee and court's financial deputy) (ADA, )
|
|
Filing
4
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; The Court is in receipt of a pro se prisoner's submission, which is styled as acomplaint for violation of civil rights pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 1 . Though the submission is rather confusing, the Court understands these allegations to be an attack on petitioner's unidentified state court sentence. Accordingly, if petitioner intended to seek a federal court remedy, the filing could be characterized as a petition for a writ of habeas cor pus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. However, as the filed pleading has various problems which need to be corrected, the Court will not recharacterize the pleading at this time, but instead will require petitioner to correct his filing. Accordingly, within 20 days of the date on this Order, petitioner must fill out and return the preprinted standard form, which is attached for his convenience and which is used to file § 2254 applications, to signify that, in filing this pleading, he inten ded to bring a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Unless petitioner complies with this order in a timely fashion, the Court will assume that he does not wish to proceed in this matter and will dismiss his pleading for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and/or want of prosecution. Signed by Chief District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 4/22/15. (c/m along with 2254 form)(ADA)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
