McClure et al v. Johnson et al
| Derrick L. McClure, Kelvin Collins, Hrondy Rogers, Terry Cydrus, Emmit Woodland, Micah Linginfelter, Melton Kirk, Kejuan Bryant and Ronald Haynes |
| Debra Johnson, Derrick Schofield, Tony Parker, Daniel Epley, f/n/u Wilkerson, Joseph Gilbert, Joseph Lucas and Rachel McCauley |
| 1:2015cv00035 |
| April 10, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Columbia Office |
| Hickman |
| William J. Haynes |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
247
ORDER: Having fully considered Plaintiff's objections, the Court concludes they are without merit, and that the Report and Recommendation 245 should be adopted and approved. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 214 is DENIED. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 3/22/19. (xc: Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
|
Filing
245
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Magistrate Judge RECOMMEDS that McClure's motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 214) be DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern on 2/22/19. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(af)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
