CP Construction, LLC et al v. Holder et al
||November 30, 2006
||Tennessee Middle District Court
||Aleta A. Trauger
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||18:1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|October 10, 2008
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: For the foregoing reasons, the undersigned recommends that a default judgment be entered in favor of Pltf Capitol City Construction, LLC, against Deft Holder in the total amount of $199,950, being $99,975 compensa tory damages, plus $99,975 in punitive damages. The undersigned further recommends that a default judgment be entered in favor of Pltf CP Construction, LLC, against Deft Holder in the total amount of $49,950, being $24,975 in compensatory damages, plus $24,975 in punitive damages. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 10/10/08. (tmw)
|November 13, 2008
ORDER accepting 52 Report and Recommendation. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that the pltf Capitol City Construction, LLC is awarded a judgment against deft George Holder in the amount of $99,975 in compensatory damage s plus $99,975 in punitive damages, for a total damage award of $199,950. It is further ORDERED that the pltf CP Construction, LLC is awarded a judgment against deft George Holder in the amount of $24,975 in compensatory damages plus $24,975 in punitive damages, for a total damage award of $49,950. These are judgments awarded to these two pltfs, for which execution may issue. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 11/13/08. (reg & cert mail to Deft Holder)(tmw)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.