Hight v. Cox et al
Daryl A. Hight |
Allyson S. Abbott, Dustin Cox and David Bragg |
3:2013cv00367 |
April 19, 2013 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Nashville Office |
Rutherford |
Aleta A. Trauger |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 49 ORDER: The plaintiff is given a deadline of February 7, 2014, to file an amended complaint. The Clerk is directed to send to the plaintiff a copy of the docket in this action and copies of Docket Entry Nos. 34, 35, 37, and 41. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 1/9/14. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail along w/copies of DEs 34, 35, 37 & 41.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(tmw) |
Filing 35 ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, the court finds as follows: The Motion for Judicial Notice (Docket No. 21) is GRANTED. The defendants' Motions to Dismiss (Docket Nos. 11 and 13) and Motion for Judgment on t he Pleadings (Docket No. 18) are GRANTED. The plaintiff's malicious prosecution claims against Officer Cox are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. All other claims are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. It is further ORDERED that the plaintiff has leave to file an Amended Complaint within 20 days of this Order that asserts amended malicious prosecution claims against Officer Cox. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 11/20/13. (tmw) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.