Kim v. Asset Acceptance, LLC

Kim v. Asset Acceptance, LLC

Plaintiff:	James Kim
Defendant:	Asset Acceptance, LLC
Case Number:	3:2014cv01138
Filed:	May 8, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office:	Nashville Office
County:	Davidson
Presiding Judge:	Juliet E. Griffin
Presiding Judge:	Kevin H. Sharp
Nature of Suit:	Consumer Credit
Cause of Action:	15 U.S.C. § 1692
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 18, 2014	Filing 7 ORDER: Pursuant to the Notice of Dismissal with Prejudice (Docket No. 6) filed by the plaintiff, this action is hereby dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rules 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 8/18/2014. (ds)
June 23, 2014	Filing 5 ORDER: On 6/20/2014, the plaintiff filed a notice of settlement 4 , in which he represented that the parties had reached a resolution of this case. ICMC is Cancelled. The plaintiff shall have until July 31, 2014, to file a notice of voluntary di smissal. The Clerk is directed to forward the file in this case to the Honorable Kevin H. Sharp for his consideration of the plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal to be filed by 7/31/2014, and entry of any appropriate order. Unless otherwis e directed by the Court or upon motion of the parties, there will be no further proceedings before the Magistrate Judge in this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 6/23/14. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 18, 2014

Filing 7 ORDER: Pursuant to the Notice of Dismissal with Prejudice (Docket No. 6) filed by the plaintiff, this action is hereby dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rules 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 8/18/2014. (ds)

June 23, 2014

Filing 5 ORDER: On 6/20/2014, the plaintiff filed a notice of settlement 4 , in which he represented that the parties had reached a resolution of this case. ICMC is Cancelled. The plaintiff shall have until July 31, 2014, to file a notice of voluntary di smissal. The Clerk is directed to forward the file in this case to the Honorable Kevin H. Sharp for his consideration of the plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal to be filed by 7/31/2014, and entry of any appropriate order. Unless otherwis e directed by the Court or upon motion of the parties, there will be no further proceedings before the Magistrate Judge in this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 6/23/14. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kim v. Asset Acceptance, LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Asset Acceptance, LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Kim
Represented By:	Jason W. Barnette
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?