Osborne-Moore v. Social Security Administration et al
Plaintiff: Melanie F. Osborne-Moore
Defendant: Social Security Administration and SSA-Email Notification
Case Number: 3:2014cv01309
Filed: June 16, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office: Nashville Office
County: Davidson
Presiding Judge: Joe Brown
Presiding Judge: Todd J. Campbell
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 26, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER: Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 18), to which no Objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and the file. The Report and Recommendation is ad opted and approved. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Docket No. 16) is DENIED, and the decision of the Defendant is affirmed. The Clerk is directed to close this file. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 5/26/2015. (xc: Pro se party by regular and certified mail) (ds)
May 4, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 18 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 16 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings: The Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Docket Entry 16) be DENIED, and the Commissioner's decision be AFFIRMED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 5/4/2015. (xc: Pro se party by regular and certified mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.) (ds)
August 26, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER: To facilitate review of the administrative decision, the plaintiff is directed to file a motion for judgment on the administrative record supported by a brief within thirty (30) days of entry of this order. The defendant shall, within twenty -eight (28) days of service of the plaintiff's brief, file a brief in response. The plaintiff has fourteen (14) days after service ofthe defendant's response to file a reply brief. Neither party is required to file motions for summary judgment or Social Security Appeal Fact forms. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 8/26/2014. (xc: Pro se party by regular and certified mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.) (ds)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Osborne-Moore v. Social Security Administration et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Melanie F. Osborne-Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Represented By: Mercedes C. Maynor-Faulcon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SSA-Email Notification
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?