Brown v. Social Security Administration

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Tennessee Middle District Brown v. Social Security Administration

Brown v. Social Security Administration

Plaintiff:	Dennis M. Brown
Defendant:	Social Security Administration
Case Number:	3:2014cv01451
Filed:	July 10, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office:	Nashville Office
County:	Davidson
Presiding Judge:	John S. Bryant
Presiding Judge:	Aleta A. Trauger
Nature of Suit:	Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 18, 2015	Filing 19 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: On August 31, 2015, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation (DE #18), to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the fin dings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that the plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (DE # 16 ) is DENIED, and the decision of the Social Security Administration is AFFIRMED. This order constitutes the judgment in this case. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 9/18/2015. (eh)
August 31, 2015	Filing 18 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Magistrate Judge recommends that plaintiff's motion for judgment on the administrative record be DENIED, and that the decision of the SSA be AFFIRMED. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 8/31/2015. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 18, 2015

Filing 19 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: On August 31, 2015, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation (DE #18), to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the fin dings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that the plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (DE # 16 ) is DENIED, and the decision of the Social Security Administration is AFFIRMED. This order constitutes the judgment in this case. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 9/18/2015. (eh)

August 31, 2015

Filing 18 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Magistrate Judge recommends that plaintiff's motion for judgment on the administrative record be DENIED, and that the decision of the SSA be AFFIRMED. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 8/31/2015. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brown v. Social Security Administration
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dennis M. Brown
Represented By:	David Clyde Downard
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Represented By:	Mercedes C. Maynor-Faulcon
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?