Cloyd v. Tennessee

Cloyd v. Tennessee

Petitioner:	LaRoy Jonathan Cloyd
Respondent:	Tennessee
Case Number:	3:2014cv01498
Filed:	July 23, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office:	Nashville Office
County:	Davidson
Presiding Judge:	Aleta A. Trauger
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 29, 2014	Filing 21 MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 10/29/2014. (xc: Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.) (ds)
August 26, 2014	Filing 11 ORDER: The court has received a letter from the petitioner (Docket No. 10), which the court construes as a motion to appoint counsel. The petitioner's motion for the appointment of counsel (Docket No. 10) is hereby DENIED at this time. Shoul d the petitioner's circumstances change or the facts of this case later reveal it to be necessary, the petitioner may refile his motion for the appointment of counsel. The petitioner also asks in his letter what he is supposed to be doing with regard to his case. Nothing further is required from the petitioner at this time. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 8/26/2014. (xc: Pro se party by regular and certified mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.) (ds)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 29, 2014

Filing 21 MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 10/29/2014. (xc: Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.) (ds)

August 26, 2014

Filing 11 ORDER: The court has received a letter from the petitioner (Docket No. 10), which the court construes as a motion to appoint counsel. The petitioner's motion for the appointment of counsel (Docket No. 10) is hereby DENIED at this time. Shoul d the petitioner's circumstances change or the facts of this case later reveal it to be necessary, the petitioner may refile his motion for the appointment of counsel. The petitioner also asks in his letter what he is supposed to be doing with regard to his case. Nothing further is required from the petitioner at this time. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 8/26/2014. (xc: Pro se party by regular and certified mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.) (ds)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cloyd v. Tennessee
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: LaRoy Jonathan Cloyd
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Tennessee
Represented By:	Nicholas White Spangler
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?