Hobson v. Hagel
| Faye R. Hobson |
| Chuck Hagel |
| 3:2014cv01540 |
| July 25, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Montgomery |
| John S. Bryant |
| Aleta A. Trauger |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
245
JUDGMENT: This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict as reflected in the verdict form filed on September 28, 2017. (Docket No. 239). The jury found that plaintiff did not p rove by a preponderance of the evidence that defendant retaliated against plaintiff in not selecting her for the 0310, Secondary English Position posted at RPA No. 13JUN7XHEKY015490 and the 0310, English Position posted at, RPA No. 13JUL7XHEKY019211. Signed by Katheryn Beasley Deputy Clerk for Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 10/2/17. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
|
Filing
143
ORDER: As an initial matter, the court takes judicial notice that Retired General James Mattis was confirmed as Secretary of Defense on January 20, 2017. He is automatically substituted as the defendant in this action by operation of Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Clerk shall make this change on the docket. For the reasons discussed in the accompanying Memorandum, the court ACCEPTS INPART AND REJECTS IN PART the R&R. The court, more specifically, REJECTS therecommend ation that the plaintiff's retaliation claim related to her non-selection for the 0310 Secondary English teaching position posted at Request for Personnel Action number 13Jun7XHEKY015490 be dismissed and DENIES summary judgment as to that claim . In all other respects, the plaintiffs objections are OVERRULED and the R&R is ACCEPTED. Summary judgment is GRANTED with respect to the other claims in the Verified Complaint or raised elsewhere in the plaintiffs filings. The trial will be rescheduled by separate order. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 2/28/2017. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
|
|
Filing
117
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 95) be GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern on 12/14/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS : The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that the defendant's Pa rtial Motion to Dismiss (DE # 14 ) is treated as a partial motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 12(d), Fed. R. Civ. P., and is hereby GRANTED. The claims made by the plaintiff in paragraphs 11 and 15 of her Complaint are DISMISSED WITH PRE JUDICE for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The defendant's motion is DENIED as to the plaintiff's claims of discrimination with regard to her non- selection for the LARS position and the AP position. This case shall be return ed to the magistrate judge for further handling under the original referral order. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 9/15/2015. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
|
|
Filing
25
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The undersigned recommends that Defendant's Partial Motion to Dismiss be treated as a motion for summary judgment per Rule 12(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Furthermore, the undersigned recommends that Defendant's Motion be GRANTED as to the claims made in paragraphs eleven and fifteen of Plaintiff's complaint. The undersigned recommends that Defendants Motion be DENIED as to Plaintiff's claims of discrimination in regards to her non-selection for the LARS position and the AP position. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 8/17/2015. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hobson v. Hagel | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Faye R. Hobson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Chuck Hagel | |
| Represented By: | Mercedes C. Maynor-Faulcon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
