Taylor v. Tennessee

Taylor v. Tennessee

Petitioner:	Keith Andre Taylor
Respondent:	Tennessee
Case Number:	3:2014cv01796
Filed:	September 3, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office:	Nashville Office
County:	Davidson
Presiding Judge:	John T. Nixon
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 1, 2015	Filing 26 ORDER: For the reasons explained more fully in the memorandum entered contemporaneously herewith, the respondent's motion to dismiss Doc. No. 21 is hereby GRANTED for failure to exhaust state court remedies. The petitioner's "Motion Grant for Relief" Doc. No. 24 is hereby DENIED. Accordingly, the petition is DENIED, and this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to refile once the petitioner has exhausted his state court remedies. The dismissal also is without prejudi ce with regard to the petitioner's ability to refile actions under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. In this case, reasonable jurists cannot conclude that the court abused its discretion in granting respondent's motion to dismiss. Thus, the court DEN IES a certificate of appealability. This order constitutes final judgment in the action. Signed by Senior Judge John T. Nixon on 7/1/15. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(am)
April 13, 2015	Filing 9 MEMORANDUM signed by Senior Judge John T. Nixon on 4/13/15. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(am)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 1, 2015

Filing 26 ORDER: For the reasons explained more fully in the memorandum entered contemporaneously herewith, the respondent's motion to dismiss Doc. No. 21 is hereby GRANTED for failure to exhaust state court remedies. The petitioner's "Motion Grant for Relief" Doc. No. 24 is hereby DENIED. Accordingly, the petition is DENIED, and this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to refile once the petitioner has exhausted his state court remedies. The dismissal also is without prejudi ce with regard to the petitioner's ability to refile actions under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. In this case, reasonable jurists cannot conclude that the court abused its discretion in granting respondent's motion to dismiss. Thus, the court DEN IES a certificate of appealability. This order constitutes final judgment in the action. Signed by Senior Judge John T. Nixon on 7/1/15. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(am)

April 13, 2015

Filing 9 MEMORANDUM signed by Senior Judge John T. Nixon on 4/13/15. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(am)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Taylor v. Tennessee
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Keith Andre Taylor
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Tennessee
Represented By:	Michael Matthew Stahl
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?