Kimble v. BC Recycling Co., Inc. et al
Chauncey Kimble |
BC Recycling Co., Inc. and William E. Chadwick |
3:2014cv02199 |
November 13, 2014 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Nashville Office |
Davidson |
Joe Brown |
Kevin H. Sharp |
Fair Labor Standards Act |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 37 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for Award of Attorney's Fees 35 is hereby GRANTED. Plaintiff shall be awarded a total of $4,434.51 for this matter, comprised of $4,025.00 in fees and $409.51 in costs. Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 1/29/16. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt) Modified on 1/29/2016 (dt). |
Filing 28 ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment 18 is GRANTED. A JUDGMENT shall be entered in FAVOR OF Plaintiff Chauncey Kimble and AGAINST Defendants BC Recycling Co., Inc. and William E. Chadwick for a total amount of $17,480.00, com prised of: a. $6,240.00 in unpaid overtime wages; b. $6,240.00 in liquidated damages pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 216(b); and c. $5,000.00 in lost wages. Plaintiff's counsel is ordered to SUBMIT a petition for fees and costs. Th is case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of the Court shall prepare and enter a final judgment in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 12/16/15. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.