Keith v. Social Security Administration

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Tennessee Middle District Keith v. Social Security Administration

Keith v. Social Security Administration

Plaintiff:	David E. Keith, II
Defendant:	Social Security Administration
Case Number:	3:2014cv02261
Filed:	November 14, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office:	Nashville Office
County:	Sumner
Presiding Judge:	E. Clifton Knowles
Presiding Judge:	Aleta A. Trauger
Nature of Suit:	Disability Insurance
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 29, 2016	Filing 20 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: The court finds the R&R to be well-founded. 1. The Objections (Docket No. 18) are OVERRULED; 2. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 17) is ACCEPTED AND ADOPTED. 3. The plaintiff's Motion for Ju dgement on the Record (Docket No. 14 ) is DENIED. 3. The decision of the Social Security Administration is AFFIRMED. This Order constitutes the judgment in this case. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 3/29/2016. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
February 23, 2016	Filing 17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The undersigned recommends that Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Docket No. 14) be DENIED, and that the decision of the Commissioner be AFFIRMED. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 2/23/2016. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 29, 2016

Filing 20 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: The court finds the R&R to be well-founded. 1. The Objections (Docket No. 18) are OVERRULED; 2. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 17) is ACCEPTED AND ADOPTED. 3. The plaintiff's Motion for Ju dgement on the Record (Docket No. 14 ) is DENIED. 3. The decision of the Social Security Administration is AFFIRMED. This Order constitutes the judgment in this case. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 3/29/2016. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)

February 23, 2016

Filing 17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The undersigned recommends that Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Docket No. 14) be DENIED, and that the decision of the Commissioner be AFFIRMED. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 2/23/2016. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Keith v. Social Security Administration
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Represented By:	Mercedes C. Maynor-Faulcon
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: David E. Keith, II
Represented By:	Phillip Alan George
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?