Jones v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC et al
| Yvonne C. Jones |
| Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC and Homeward Residential, Inc. |
| 3:2014cv02328 |
| December 4, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Davidson |
| Todd J. Campbell |
| All Other Real Property |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
ORDER: The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 28) is adopted and approved, and this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. Any pending Motions are denied as moot, and the Clerk is directed to close the file. This Order sh all constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. Plaintiffs Motion for Review 31 is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint 33 is DENIED as futile. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 7/21/15. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(am)
|
|
Filing
28
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that Plaintiff's Complaint be DISMISSED without prejudice and that all pending Motions (Docket Entry 18, 20 and 21) be TERMINATED as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 7/1/2015. (xc: Pro se party by regular and certified mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.) (ds)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
