Kinnard v. General Motors Corporation

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Tennessee Middle District Kinnard v. General Motors Corporation

Kinnard v. General Motors Corporation

Plaintiff:	Cynthia Kinnard
Defendant:	General Motors Corporation
Case Number:	3:2015cv00036
Filed:	January 13, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office:	Nashville Office
County:	Davidson
Presiding Judge:	Juliet E. Griffin
Presiding Judge:	John T. Nixon
Nature of Suit:	Employment
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 12, 2017	Filing 12 ORDER: Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation (R & R) of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 8), recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rules 4(m) and 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 41.01. Neither party has filed any objections to the Magistrate Judge's R & R. Where no objections are made to the R & R, [t]he district judge may accept, reject, or modify the recommended disposition; receive further evidence; or return the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b). Having conducted a de novo review in accordance with Rule 72, the Court will accept the disposition set forth in the R & R. Accordingly, the Court rules as follows: (1) The R & R (Docket No. 8) is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED; (2) This action is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk of the Court shall enter Final Judgment in a separate document in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 1/12/17. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(am)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 12, 2017

Filing 12 ORDER: Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation (R & R) of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 8), recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rules 4(m) and 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 41.01. Neither party has filed any objections to the Magistrate Judge's R & R. Where no objections are made to the R & R, [t]he district judge may accept, reject, or modify the recommended disposition; receive further evidence; or return the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b). Having conducted a de novo review in accordance with Rule 72, the Court will accept the disposition set forth in the R & R. Accordingly, the Court rules as follows: (1) The R & R (Docket No. 8) is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED; (2) This action is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk of the Court shall enter Final Judgment in a separate document in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 1/12/17. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(am)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kinnard v. General Motors Corporation
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cynthia Kinnard
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: General Motors Corporation
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?