Hunt v. Goodwill Industries of Middle Tennessee, Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Tennessee Middle District Hunt v. Goodwill Industries of Middle Tennessee, Inc.

Hunt v. Goodwill Industries of Middle Tennessee, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Cynthia T. Hunt
Defendant:	Goodwill Industries of Middle Tennessee, Inc.
Case Number:	3:2015cv00417
Filed:	April 13, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office:	Nashville Office
County:	Davidson
Presiding Judge:	John S. Bryant
Presiding Judge:	Kevin H. Sharp
Nature of Suit:	Employment
Cause of Action:	29 U.S.C. § 621
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 1, 2016	Filing 30 MEMORANDUM and ORDER re 17 MOTION for Discovery filed by Cynthia T. Hunt. For the reasons stated above with respect to Interrogatory No. 5, the undersigned Magistrate Judge GRANTS Plaintiff's motion to compel with respect to Inter rogatory No. 8 and ORDERS that Defendant shall describe the process for selection of applicants for the position of Store Manager at other stores under Ms. Spurlin's supervision, at least to the extent that it differs from the process fol lowed at the Spring Hill store. The undersigned finds that Plaintiff's motion to compel production of the sales rank reports as requested should be GRANTED, but only for the stores managed by Randy Taylor and Dorothy Gray. To the extent that Plaintiff's request seeks sales rank reports from other stores, the motion is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 7/1/2016. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jw)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 1, 2016

Filing 30 MEMORANDUM and ORDER re 17 MOTION for Discovery filed by Cynthia T. Hunt. For the reasons stated above with respect to Interrogatory No. 5, the undersigned Magistrate Judge GRANTS Plaintiff's motion to compel with respect to Inter rogatory No. 8 and ORDERS that Defendant shall describe the process for selection of applicants for the position of Store Manager at other stores under Ms. Spurlin's supervision, at least to the extent that it differs from the process fol lowed at the Spring Hill store. The undersigned finds that Plaintiff's motion to compel production of the sales rank reports as requested should be GRANTED, but only for the stores managed by Randy Taylor and Dorothy Gray. To the extent that Plaintiff's request seeks sales rank reports from other stores, the motion is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 7/1/2016. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hunt v. Goodwill Industries of Middle Tennessee, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cynthia T. Hunt
Represented By:	Irwin Bruce Venick
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Goodwill Industries of Middle Tennessee, Inc.
Represented By:	Megan M. Sutton
Represented By:	Kenneth A. Weber
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?