Wesley v. United States of America
Petitioner: Donald Wesley
Respondent: United States of America
Case Number: 1:2014cv01211
Filed: August 26, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee
Office: Jackson Office
County: Madison
Presiding Judge: J. Daniel Breen
Presiding Judge: Edward G. Bryant
Nature of Suit: Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 22, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER GRANTING 5 PETITIONER'S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT §2255 PETITION WITH ADDITIONAL SUPPORTING LAW AND DENYING 4 6 MOTIONS FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL. Signed by Chief Judge J. Daniel Breen on 6/22/16. (Breen, J.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wesley v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Donald Wesley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Represented By: 2255 AUSA-Jackson
Represented By: Victor Lee Ivy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?