Stuntz v. Ashland Elastomers, LLC et al
| Michael David Stuntz |
| Ashland Elastomers, LLC, ISP Synthetic Elastomers, LP and ISP Synthetic Elastomers, LLC |
| 1:2014cv00173 |
| March 21, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Beaumont Office |
| Jefferson |
| Ron Clark |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
293
ORDER ADOPTING 290 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 146 is DENIED. Defendants', Ashland Elastomers, LLC and Lion Elastomers, LLC, Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the Donning and Doffing Claims 138 & 152 and Motion for Summary Judgment 238 & 239 are GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Marcia A. Crone on 3/14/19. (ljw, )
|
|
Filing
289
ORDER overruling plaintiffs' objections to the 280 Report and Recommendation and denying the 181 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Marcia A. Crone on 1/16/2019. (bjc, )
|
|
Filing
276
ORDER overruling plaintiff's objections and adopting the 268 Report and Recommendation. Defendant's 216 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted, and Plaintiff Stuntz's individual retaliation claim under the Fair Labor Standards Act against Lion Elastomers is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by District Judge Marcia A. Crone on 10/17/2018. (bjc, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
