Hill v. Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan

Justia Dockets & Filings Fifth Circuit Texas Eastern District Hill v. Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan

Hill v. Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan

Plaintiff:	Gregory Hill
Defendant:	Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan
Case Number:	4:2013cv00074
Filed:	February 12, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office:	Sherman Office
County:	Denton
Presiding Judge:	Don D. Bush
Presiding Judge:	Richard A. Schell
Nature of Suit:	Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action:	29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 29, 2014	Filing 31 MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DENYING 16 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Gregory Hill, GRANTING 17 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, filed by Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan. Signed by Judge Richard A. Schell on 9/29/2014. (baf, )
August 26, 2014	Filing 28 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 16 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Gregory Hill, 17 MOTION for Judgment on the Administrative Record and Incorporated Memorandum in Support re 13 Sealed Document, 14 Sealed Document filed by Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan. Within fourteen (14) days after service of the magistrate judges report, any party may serve and file written objections to the findings and recommendations of the magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(b)(1)(c). Signed by Magistrate Judge Don D. Bush on 8/26/14. (cm, )

Date Filed

Document Text

September 29, 2014

Filing 31 MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DENYING 16 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Gregory Hill, GRANTING 17 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, filed by Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan. Signed by Judge Richard A. Schell on 9/29/2014. (baf, )

August 26, 2014

Filing 28 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 16 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Gregory Hill, 17 MOTION for Judgment on the Administrative Record and Incorporated Memorandum in Support re 13 Sealed Document, 14 Sealed Document filed by Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan. Within fourteen (14) days after service of the magistrate judges report, any party may serve and file written objections to the findings and recommendations of the magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(b)(1)(c). Signed by Magistrate Judge Don D. Bush on 8/26/14. (cm, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hill v. Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gregory Hill
Represented By:	Jeffrey F Dahl
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?