State Farm Lloyds Insurance v. Titeflex Corporation, Gastite Division
| State Farm Lloyds Insurance |
| Titeflex Corporation, Gastite Division |
| 4:2013cv00219 |
| April 15, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Sherman Office |
| Denton |
| Don D. Bush |
| Richard A. Schell |
| Prop. Damage Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Defendant |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: State Farm Lloyds Insurance v. Titeflex Corporation, Gastite Division | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Titeflex Corporation, Gastite Division | |
| Represented By: | Luke McHenry |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: State Farm Lloyds Insurance | |
| Represented By: | Craig Michael Schumacher |
| Represented By: | Nathan Scott Carpenter |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
