Network-1 Technologies, Inc v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. et al
| Network-1 Security Solutions, Inc. |
| Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc., Alcatel-Lucent Holdings Inc., Allied Telesis Holdings K.K., Allied Telesis, Inc., Avaya Inc., AXIS Communications AB, AXIS Communications, Inc., Dell Inc., Garrettcom, Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company, Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P., Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., Huawei Technologies USA Inc., Juniper Networks, Inc., Motorola Solutions, Inc., NEC Corporation, NEC Corporation of America, Polycom, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung TeleCommunications America, LLC, Shoretel, Inc., Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Electronics Inc. and Transition Networks, Inc. |
| 6:2011cv00492 |
| September 15, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Tyler Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Leonard Davis |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
1068
ORDER ADOPTING 978 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The Court ADOPTS the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as those of the Court. In light of the foregoing, it is ORDERED that Network-1's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Estop pel (Docket No. 811 ) is GRANTED. Accordingly, HP is estopped from asserting the following obviousness arguments at trial: (1) obviousness over Lehr in view of Woodmas and Chang; and (2) obviousness over Yano in view of Woodmas. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 10/27/2017. (rlf)
|
|
Filing
1059
ORDER denying 994 Motion to Supplement the Expert Report of M. Ray Perryman, PhD. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 10/25/2017. (rlf)
|
|
Filing
1051
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 824 Sealed Motion to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Mr. Robert Mills. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 10/23/2017. (rlf)
|
|
Filing
1028
ORDER ADOPTING 954 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and GRANTING-IN-PART AND DENYING-IN-PART 825 Defendants' (Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company and Hewlett-Packard Company) Motion for Summary Judgment of FRAND Obligation. Signed by Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 10/16/2017. (rlf)
|
|
Filing
1015
ORDER denying 822 Defendant Juniper Networks. Inc.'s Motion to Strike Portions of Dr. Knox's Infringement Opinions and Supplemental Infringement Reports. Because Juniper had the opportunity and did indeed depose Dr. Knox about his Second Supplemental Expert Report, Juniper's request for a half of a day deposition of Dr. Knox is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 10/11/2017. (rlf)
|
|
Filing
973
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 810 Network-1 Technologies, Inc.'s Motion to Exclude Certain Opinions of Hewlett-Packard Companys (HP) Expert, Dr. M. Ray Perryman. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 9/21/2017. (rlf)
|
|
Filing
962
ORDER denying 821 Motion to Exclude Certain Opinions and Testimony of Dr. James Knox. Defendants' motion to strike is denied as to Dr. Knox's apportionment analysis. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 9/13/2017. (rlf)
|
|
Filing
959
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 817 Motion to Exclude an Opinion and the Testimony of Juniper's Technical Expert Dr. Cameron H. G. Wright. Plaintiff's Motion to Exclude is accordingly granted as to the above-italicized portions of the opinions on page 24 of Dr. Wrights November 30, 2016 Declaration. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 9/12/2017. (rlf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
