Clear With Computers LLC v. Tesla Motors Inc
Plaintiff Clear With Computers, LLC alleged that Defendant Tesla Motors, Inc. infringed U.S. Patent No. 5,625,776 entitled "Electronic Proposal Preparation System for Selling Computer Equipment and Copy Machines" and U.S. Patent No. 7,606,739 entitled "Electronic Proposal Preparation System" by receiving a customer's desired equipment features and uses by presenting the customer with a plurality of questions relating to the features and uses of the equipment, receiving the answers, and generating a customized proposal in response to the answers.
| Clear With Computers LLC |
| Tesla Motors Inc |
| 6:2014cv00087 |
| February 11, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Tyler Office |
| Collin |
| Leonard Davis |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2014. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 RESPONSE to COUNTERCLAIMS filed by Clear With Computers LLC. (Spangler, Andrew) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to 1 Complaint , COUNTERCLAIM against Clear With Computers LLC by Tesla Motors Inc.(Stephens, Garland) |
| Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is GRANTED pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Tesla Motors Inc to 4/25/2014. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( sm, ) |
| Filing 8 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Tesla Motors Inc.( Stephens, Garland) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Clear With Computers LLC. Tesla Motors Inc served on 3/5/2014, answer due 3/26/2014. (mjc, ) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Issued as to Tesla Motors Inc and emailed to pltf for service. (klb) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Richard C Weinblatt on behalf of Clear With Computers LLC (Weinblatt, Richard) |
| Judge Leonard Davis added. (mll, ) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Clear With Computers LLC (Spangler, Andrew) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Spangler, Andrew) |
| Filing 2 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Clear With Computers LLC. (Spangler, Andrew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Tesla Motors Inc ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-4519054.), filed by Clear With Computers LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Spangler, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Clear With Computers LLC v. Tesla Motors Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Clear With Computers LLC | |
| Represented By: | Andrew W. Spangler |
| Represented By: | Richard C Weinblatt |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Tesla Motors Inc | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
