Flores v. Boecker
Plaintiff: Christopher Flores
Defendant: Dale L. Boecker
Case Number: 1:2010cv00098
Filed: May 21, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office: Abilene Office
County: Howard
Presiding Judge: Sam R Cummings
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 6, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 67 Memorandum Opinion and Order granting 54 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, denying Plaintiff's 56 Motion in Limine and Motion for Leave to File Amended Motion in Limine 57 . Summary judgment shall entered in favor of Defendant Dale L. Boecker. Any other pending motions are denied. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge E. Scott Frost on 7/6/2012) (chmb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Flores v. Boecker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher Flores
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dale L. Boecker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?