Cable Electronics Inc v. North American Cable Equipment Inc et al 
| Plaintiff: |
Cable Electronics Inc |
| Defendants: |
North American Cable Equipment Inc, Aaron Starr and Lawrence Rufo |
| |
| Case Number: |
3:2008cv00433 |
| Filed: |
March 12, 2008 |
| |
| Court: |
Texas Northern District Court |
| Office: |
Trademark Office |
| County: |
Dallas |
| Presiding Judge: |
Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn |
| |
| Nature of Suit: |
Intellectual Property - Trademark |
| Cause: |
Federal Question |
| Jurisdiction: |
Federal Question |
| Jury Demanded By: |
15:1121 Trademark Infringement |
| |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download.
| Date Filed | # | Document Text |
|---|
| April 15, 2010 | 112 | Memorandum Opinion and Order Denying 59 Motion to Dismiss filed by Blue Whale Limited, and 95 Supplemental MOTION to Dismiss Cable Electronics, Inc.'s Second Amended Complaint for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction filed by Blue Whale Limited. See Order (Ordered by Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn on 4/15/2010) (svc) |
| August 10, 2009 | 76 | (Amended) Memorandum Opinion and Order granting 61 Motion for Extension of Time to Conduct Discovery. Blue Whale's counsel has moved to withdraw, and given the timing in the Court's Order on that Motion, all discovery may be scheduled so as to be completed by October 30, 2009. (see order) (Ordered by Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn on 8/10/09) (lmp) |
| August 4, 2009 | 75 | [Amended by Docket Entry #76 (see order)] Memorandum Opinion and Order granting 61 Motion for Extension of Time to Conduct Discovery. Blue Whale's counsel has moved to withdraw, and given the timing in the Court's Order on that Motion, all discovery may be scheduled so as to be due on or before October 2, 2009, so long as it is completed by October 30, 2009. (see order) (Ordered by Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn on 8/4/09) (tln) Modified on 8/12/2009 (jrb). |
Last Document Downloaded: April 16, 2010 15:40:00 PDT
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to
PACER is required.