Bank of New York Mellon v. Coleman
Bank of New York Mellon |
Audrey Coleman |
3:2013cv00903 |
February 27, 2013 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Dallas Office |
Dallas |
Barbara M.G. Lynn |
Irma Carrillo Ramirez |
Truth in Lending |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity: Forcible Detainer |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER ACCEPTING 7 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Accordingly, this action will be sua sponte REMANDED to the Dallas County Court at Law No. 4 by separate judgment. (Ordered by Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 4/10/2013) (ctf) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Bank of New York Mellon v. Coleman | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Bank of New York Mellon | |
Represented By: | Gabriel Ozel |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Audrey Coleman | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.