Baron et al v. Sherman

Appellant: Jeffrey Baron
Appellee: Daniel J Sherman
Case Number: 3:2013cv01294
Filed: March 28, 2013
Court: Texas Northern District Court
Office: Dallas Office
County: Anderson
Presiding Judge: Royal Furgeson
Nature of Suit: Bankruptcy Appeal
Cause of Action: 28:0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 30, 2013 8 Opinion or Order of the Court Memorandum Opinion and Order: The court, pursuant to Rule 8001(a) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, sua sponte dismisses with prejudice this appeal and denies as moot Appellant's Motion to Re-Designate Parties (Doc. 7 ). (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 10/30/2013) (ctf)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Baron et al v. Sherman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: Jeffrey Baron
Represented By: Stephen R Cochell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: Daniel J Sherman
Represented By: Raymond J Urbanik
Represented By: Daniel John Sherman
Represented By: Jeffrey R Fine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.