OMG, L.P. et al v. Heritage Auctions, Inc.
Plaintiff: OMG LP, John Gallo and Greg Martin
Defendant: Heritage Auctions Inc
Case Number: 3:2013cv01404
Filed: April 8, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office: Dallas Office
County: Dallas
Presiding Judge: Sam A Lindsay
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER: The court determines that the 61 magistrate judge's findings and conclusions are no longer applicable, and rejects the Report as moot. The court denies as moot 48 Plaintiffs' Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 6/30/2015) (axm)
March 31, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER: The court conducted an independent review of the Report, and based upon the record, arguments of the parties, and applicable law, the court determines that the 34 findings, and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct. Accordingly, th ey are accepted as the findings and conclusions of the court, and the court overrules Heritages objections. For the reasons herein stated and those set forth in the Report, the court grants Plaintiffs' 1 Motion to Vacate Final Arbitration Awar d and denies Heritage's 15 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award. Accordingly, the court vacates the arbitration award of 1/9/2013, and remands this action to the American Arbitration Association for further proceedings consistent with this order. All allowable and reasonable costs will be taxed against Heritage. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 3/31/2014) (ctf)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: OMG, L.P. et al v. Heritage Auctions, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: OMG LP
Represented By: Jonathan M Hyman
Represented By: Stephen S Mayne
Represented By: Christopher A Rheinheimer
Represented By: Charles W Sartain
Represented By: Thomas John Ward
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Gallo
Represented By: Jonathan M Hyman
Represented By: Stephen S Mayne
Represented By: Christopher A Rheinheimer
Represented By: Charles W Sartain
Represented By: Thomas John Ward
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Greg Martin
Represented By: Jonathan M Hyman
Represented By: Stephen S Mayne
Represented By: Christopher A Rheinheimer
Represented By: Charles W Sartain
Represented By: Thomas John Ward
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Heritage Auctions Inc
Represented By: Mark W Bayer
Represented By: Rachel Kingrey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?