AutoOpt Networks Inc v. GTL USA Inc et al
| AutoOpt Networks, Inc. |
| GTL USA, Inc., GTL International LTD., GTL LTD, Urmeet Singh Juneja, Sukanta Kumar Roy, Retassh Arvind Bhansali, Manoj Gajanan Tirodkar, Pinakin B. Gandhi, John Does #1-10 and Richard Roes 1-10 |
| 3:2014cv01252 |
| April 8, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Dallas Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Sidney A Fitzwater |
| Other Statutes: Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
135
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 20 68 MOTION to dismiss of the GTL Defendants; granting 91 Kamat's motion to dismiss AutoOpt's fraud claim; denying without prejudice 96 Roy's supplemental mot ion to dismiss; denying without prejudice 97 Tirodkar's supplemental motion to dismiss; and granting AutoOpt leave to replead its fraud claim no later than 28 days after the date this memorandum opinion and order is filed. (Ordered by Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 1/30/2015) (Judge Sidney A Fitzwater)
|
|
Filing
65
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part, denying in part 20 Motion to Dismiss filed by Urmeet Singh Juneja, GTL USA, Inc., GTL LTD, Sukanta Kumar Roy, GTL International LTD. (Ordered by Chief Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 6/16/2014) (Chief Judge Sidney A Fitzwater)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
