Woodberry v. Dallas Area Rapid Transit Bus Service LGC et al
Plaintiff: Woodberry
Defendant: MV Transportation Inc, Cedrick Agent and Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART)
Case Number: 3:2014cv03980
Filed: November 11, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office: Dallas Office
County: Dallas
Presiding Judge: Sam A Lindsay
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 0794
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 20, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 254 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part, denying in part 250 Plaintiff's MOTION to Retax Costs. The court disallows the $1,800 in costs sought by Defendants, and hereby reduces Defendants' recoverable costs from $4,537.95 to $2,737.95. Accordingly, the clerk of court shall tax $2,737.95 as costs against Plaintiff Woodberry. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 4/20/2017) (aaa)
March 3, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 246 Memorandum Opinion and Order: The court grants Defendant DART's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 148 ). Grants Defendants MV Transportation, Inc and Cedrick Agent's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 151 ). Grants Defendant Pursuit of Excellence Inc's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 157 ). Plaintiff's federal and state law claims against Defendants DART, MVT, and POE, and Plaintiff's state law claims against Defendant Agent are hereby dismissed with prejud ice, and Plaintiff's Motion to Limit the Testimony of Dr. J. Douglas Crowder (Doc. 238 ) and Defendants MV Transportation, Inc. and Cedrick Agent's Motion to Strike, Limit or Exclude Certain Expert testimony (Doc. 154 ) are, therefore, denied as moot. This action is hereby dismissed with prejudice. As required, a final judgment will issue by separate document pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 3/3/2017) (ndt)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Woodberry v. Dallas Area Rapid Transit Bus Service LGC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MV Transportation Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cedrick Agent
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Woodberry
Represented By: T Nguyen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?