Watkins et al v. City of Arlington
| Kory Watkins and Open Carry Tarrant County |
| City of Arlington |
| 4:2014cv00381 |
| May 28, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Fort Worth Office |
| Tarrant |
| Reed C O'Connor |
| Constitutionality of State Statutes |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
82
Memorandum Opinion and Order: Based on the foregoing, Section 15.02 is constitutional on its face. It is therefore ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 47 is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment 49 is DE NIED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs must file a brief establishing the amount of past damages and attorneys fees on or before September 2, 2015, and Defendant must file a response brief, if any, on or before September 16, 2015. The Court will issue its Final Judgment separately. (Ordered by Judge Reed C O'Connor on 8/12/2015) (ewd)
|
|
Filing
19
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 5 Plaintiffs' Combined Application for Preliminary Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order. It is ORDERED that Defendant City of Arlington is hereby preliminarily enjoined from taking any action to enforce Section 15.02 of the Streets and Sidewalks Chapter of the Code of the City of Arlington until a final trial on the merits. (Ordered by Judge Reed C O'Connor on 7/14/2014) (skt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
