Bridgestone Retail Operations L.L.C. v. Dr. Robert D. Shlens
| Bridgestone Retail Operations L.L.C. |
| Dr. Robert D. Shlens |
| 4:2014cv00675 |
| August 18, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Fort Worth Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Jeffrey L Cureton |
| Recovery of Overpayment and Enforcement of Judgment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bridgestone Retail Operations L.L.C. v. Dr. Robert D. Shlens | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Dr. Robert D. Shlens | |
| Represented By: | Ryan Logan Valdez |
| Represented By: | J Frank Kinsel, Jr |
| Represented By: | Timothy Derek Carson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Bridgestone Retail Operations L.L.C. | |
| Represented By: | T Christopher Trent |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
