UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. REAL PROPERTY, KNOWN AS 334 PADRE BOULEVARD, CONDOMINIUM UNIT 1401, CAMERON COUNTY, TEXAS 78597

Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: REAL PROPERTY, KNOWN AS 334 PADRE BOULEVARD, CONDOMINIUM UNIT 1401, CAMERON COUNTY, TEXAS 78597
Case Number: 2:2012cv00167
Filed: May 22, 2012
Court: Texas Southern District Court
Office: Corpus Christi Office
County: Cameron
Presiding Judge: Nelva Gonzales Ramos
Nature of Suit: Drug Related Seizure of Property
Cause of Action: 21:881
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. REAL PROPERTY, KNOWN AS 334 PADRE BOULEVARD, CONDOMINIUM UNIT 1401, CAMERON COUNTY, TEXAS 78597
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Julie K Hampton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: REAL PROPERTY, KNOWN AS 334 PADRE BOULEVARD, CONDOMINIUM UNIT 1401, CAMERON COUNTY, TEXAS 78597
Represented By: David George Oliveira
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.