Masitta v. Labor Max Staffing
Wycliffe M. Masitta |
Labor Max Staffing |
2:2014cv00354 |
August 25, 2014 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Corpus Christi Office |
Nueces |
Jason B. Libby |
Nelva Gonzales Ramos |
Other Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 451 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 19 Memorandum and Recommendations, granting 18 MOTION to Dismiss For Want of Prosecution (Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(lcayce, 2) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Masitta v. Labor Max Staffing | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Wycliffe M. Masitta | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Labor Max Staffing | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.