Maxwell v. Chase Home Finance LLC et al
| James H. Maxwell |
| Chase Home Finance LLC, U.S. Bank National Association J.P. Morgan Mortgage and Does 1-50 |
| 4:2009cv04038 |
| December 18, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Houston Office |
| Harris |
| Melinda Harmon |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
OPINION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL denying 36 Motion to Amend; mooting 45 Motion to Compel; denying 47 Motion for Leave to File; granting 23 Motion to Dismiss.(Signed by Judge Melinda Harmon) Parties notified.(htippen, )
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER denying 11 Motion to Stay; granting 12 Motion to Strike, striking 9 First Amended Complaint. The Court ADMONISHES Plaintiff that if he fails to file timely an amended complaint, as ordered, or show good cause why he could not, this case will be dismissed.(Signed by Judge Melinda Harmon) Parties notified.(htippen, )
|
|
Filing
14
OPINION AND ORDER denying 4 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, but their motion for more definite statement is granted; denying 5 Plaintiff's Motion for order of Judgment. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint within twenty days with sufficient facts to state a claim for which relief may be granted under Twombley.(Signed by Judge Melinda Harmon) Parties notified.(htippen, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
