Disabled Access, Inc. et al v. Macy's Retail Holdings Inc.

Defendant: Macy's Retail Holdings Inc.
Plaintiff: Stephen Mattix and Disabled Access, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2013cv00873
Filed: March 28, 2013
Court: Texas Southern District Court
Office: Houston Office
County: Harris
Presiding Judge: Lynn N. Hughes
Referring Judge: Stephen Smith
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12188
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Disabled Access, Inc. et al v. Macy's Retail Holdings Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Macy's Retail Holdings Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stephen Mattix
Represented By: Ronald Julius Smeberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Disabled Access, Inc.
Represented By: Ronald Julius Smeberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.