S.P.M. Flow Control, Inc. v. Special Piping Materials Limited et al

Defendant: Special Piping Materials Limited and Special Piping Materials INC.
Plaintiff: S.P.M. Flow Control, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2013cv00995
Filed: April 8, 2013
Court: Texas Southern District Court
Office: Houston Office
County: Harris
Presiding Judge: David Hittner
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: S.P.M. Flow Control, Inc. v. Special Piping Materials Limited et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Special Piping Materials Limited
Represented By: Charles L Stinneford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Special Piping Materials INC.
Represented By: Charles L Stinneford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: S.P.M. Flow Control, Inc.
Represented By: Janice Housey
Represented By: Eric Paul Mirabel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.