Antoniewicz et al v. The University of Texas Health and Science Center at Houston et al
Leah Antoniewicz and Michele Curtis |
The University of Texas Health and Science Center at Houston, Sebastian Faro and Sean Blackwell |
4:2014cv02083 |
July 21, 2014 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Houston Office |
Harris |
Gray H. Miller |
Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 46 MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER GRANTING 42 MOTION for Leave to File Answer, GRANTING 41 MOTION for Summary Judgment .(Signed by Judge Gray H Miller) Parties notified.(rkonieczny, 4) |
Filing 22 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART, DENYING IN PART 10 AMENDED 9 MOTION to Dismiss (converted to a motion for summary judgment) (Signed by Judge Gray H. Miller) Parties notified.(rkonieczny, 4) |
Filing 15 ORDER DENYING AS MOOT 9 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment ; converting the motion to dismiss to a motion for summary judgment. Defendants shall file any supplemental briefing and evidence supporting their arguments within 10 days of th e date of this order. Plaintiffs shall file responsive briefing and attach any evidence indicating that there is an issue of material fact with regard to this particular claim within twenty days of the date of this order.(Signed by Judge Gray H. Miller) Parties notified.(rkonieczny, 4) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.